On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:35:19 +0200 (CEST), Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Pete Zaitcev wrote:

> I think I see an issue here. Imagine that you boot a system initially with 
> one keyboard connected (usb, ps/2, doesn't matter), and after some time 
> you connect second USB keyboard (the NumLock is 'on' on the first keyboard 
> when you connect the second one).
> 
> Without your patch, the NumLock led will be OK on the second keyboard 
> immediately. With your patch, the NumLock will be forced to 'off' and it 
> will be out of sync with the first keyboard. The leds will get in sync 
> later when any change occurs. 

Oh, right, I missed it. The difficulty is how I rely on usages and fields
being already mapped by hidinput_configure_usage(). Thanks for letting me
know, I'll think about it.

-- Pete

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to