Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > No, please don't do that. As soon as there is a special driver written > for a device that device's VID/PID should be added to generic HID > blacklist. This way udev will load the proper driver right away and > there will not be any flip-flopping of input devices. > Hi, I do not think that using blacklist in base driver for this purpose is good idea. If so, we need modify source when each new HID device driver come, that's so ugly. I think the blacklist only should be used for those really broken/buggy hardware, not for these normal hardware with extended feature.
Er, I also want to know what are drawbacks of "flip-flopping" ? > > >> When user A remove this shadow driver, the USB/base driver should resume >> work for this joystick, IOW, it should register back its input device again. >> >> > > Why would we want to revert to using generic HID's implementation if we > know that it is broken for that particular device??? > > Well, many devices just only can not play its full feature, not broken. so base driver still can work for us. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
