On Friday 18 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 00:47:59 -0800 David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > On Thursday 09 November 2006 11:56 pm, Stefan Meyer wrote:
> > 
> > > Changing it to 0x0000001C creates a 512MByte windows (this was of course a
> > > non-generic quick fix).
> > > Running with anything up to 256MByte is fine.
> > > My system has 512MByte and it took quite a bit of chasing to find this
> > > issue.
> > 
> > A better patch would (a) fix the comment which says both lines of
> > code affects the PHY, (b) not hard-wire the amount of memory on
> > the system.
> > 
> > Assuming it's possible to put non-cacheable memory into that chunk
> > of address space (memory mapped peripherals etc) then it's dangerous
> > to hard-wire _any_ value.
> > 
> 
> So, did this ever get fixed? (Full history at
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7482)

Not from what I can tell.  I cc'd the Freescale person who seems
to be maintaining EHCI on that platform ...


> 
> Thanks.
> 



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to