On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 21:17 -0700, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > Note, I've taken LKML off the CC list anyone interested in this on there is > also on linux-usb-devel. I've also added the usb-storage list. > > See rest of response below. > > Ben Collins wrote: > >>> +/* SanDisk that has a second LUN for a driver ISO, reported by > >>> + * Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> */ > >>> +UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x0781, 0x5406, 0x0000, 0xffff, > >> Please use specific device IDs unless you have reason to believe the range > >> as a whole is affected (or large portions at least) > > > > Unfortunately, I don't have this device anymore. I based it on an > > existing entry, so mislead myself there. > > I don't like to merge these because it means some other user of some new > device can get unintended consequences - but if we don't have access to the > data, it's better than nothing. Were you the person who owned the device? If > not, do you still have the contact info - perhaps in a bugzilla or BTS > somewhere?
For this device, yes. > >>> +/* Reported by Edward Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > No need to have EMAIL PROTECTED there. Just don't put it in. However, as > much as I don't like entries that span entire bcdDevice IDs, I like even > *less* entries that don't let me go back to the original user when I'm > considering a patch that may well _break_ their device. So please consider > adding it in a foo _at_ bar _dot_ com notation, or making yourself the > contact, or if you must, just leave his name. That's what the mailing list archive had in it :) Copy-and-paste > >>> + Netac OnlyDisk Mini U2CV2 512MB USB 2.0 Flash Drive */ > >>> +UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x0dd8, 0xd202, 0x0000, 0x9999, > >> Same here. > > > > This one I snatched off a mailing list archive somewhere. Was reported > > to fix a bug reported to us. However, it is so old I can't find any > > information on the bug submitters original USB ids. > > Eh - I'm a bit confused. You snatched the entry as a whole off of a mailing > list? One would then assume it wasn't this list, or the entry would have > been merged or rejected. This makes me question if this entry is validly > needed. US_FL_IGNORE_RESIDE is a bad thing to do is if it's not actually > needed. IIRC, the bug report pointed to this diff, had reported that it fixed his problem after recompiling and testing with it. -- Ubuntu : http://www.ubuntu.com/ Linux1394: http://wiki.linux1394.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
