[I hate it when people include a long quoted message in their replies for no good reason... Yes, lots of people do it out of sheer laziness and it's unfair for me to complain only to you. But still... ]
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Craig W. Nadler wrote: > After thinking about it, it seems very scary to unnecessarily change so > many HCDs. Especially as I have no way to test many of them. I've > attached a patch for just the EHCI driver. Sounds reasonable. > I also noticed that the port numbers are shown incorrectly for devices > in /proc/bus/usb/devices . It has the ports numbered from 0 instead of 1 > as specified in the USB spec.. The attached patch called > "usbfs_port_num.patch" adds one to the 0 based port number before > displaying it. Please note that Host Controller still has a port number > of 0. No, you can't do this. The /proc/bus/usb/devices API has been around for a long time and user programs may well depend on it. We must not change it, even though it is bad. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
