Alan Stern wrote: > On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Mike Nuss wrote: > >>> If all else fails and you can't get timely interrupts, you can always >>> fall back on a kernel timer. Scan through the data structures once a >>> second or thereabouts. As an optimization, allow the timer to run only >>> while there are active URBs. >> Yes, I'm thinking this might be the only way that will always work. How >> prevalent is that kind of workaround in the kernel? > > It happens here and there. If you need it, don't feel shy about > putting it in. Just make sure there's minimal overhead for systems > that don't need it.
I have the fix in place now, and it's working great. Is there anyone in particular I should send it to for review? Which version of the kernel should I diff against? Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
