On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:49:34AM +0200, Alain Degreffe wrote: > Greg, > > You are right ( of course ), but using the buffer given by the usb-serial > seems to bo logic as I said. > By this way I don't create unnecessary buffer. But in bulk transfer, the > buffer_size can be greater than > The value given by the endpoint. The usb lowlevel will split the bulk > tranfsert. > So, why this limit in the usb-serial.c ?
It is there just because it has always been that way, no specific reason at all. > For the moment , I kfree the buffer In the my open function and create > a new one bigger. That can work too, and is fine if you want to do that. thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
