On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:00:04 -0500, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> + list_for_each_safe (entry, tmp, &qh->qtd_list) {
> + qtd = list_entry (entry, struct ehci_qtd, qtd_list);
> + if (cpu_to_le32 (qtd->qtd_dma) == qh->hw_current)
> + return qtd;
> + }
Why use list_for_each_safe when mere list_for_each would do?
In fact, some might ask for list_for_each_entry.
-- Pete
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
