On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 22:17:24 -0700, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure, if you think it's better that there are not bitfields there, feel > free to send me a patch. I suppose we'd need an Edgeport connected to a Mac, to see how the layout changes. I think just about every architecture uses bitfields laid from low bits up (except s390, to which you cannot connect an Edgeport unless you use USB-over-Ethernet). The problem is that some of the fields are unsigned int foo:31, and the data is DMA-ed out of the adapter. Unfortunately, my coworker's adapter turned out to be a normal, non-EPiC based Edgeport, and so I cannot test after all. I still can make a patch, but cannot be sure I got it right. -- Pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
