On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, David Brownell wrote: > I'd expect so -- most of the USB 2.0 adaptors now available are NEC > based, though mine says "rev 01". I don't know if "rev 02" is how NEC > is presenting their updated/faster/... chips ... when the driver starts up, > does it say "EHCI 0.95" still? They say their "EHCI 1.0" chips will be > something like 20% faster.
Shame, it still says 0.95... hcd.c: ehci-hcd @ 00:0a.2, PCI device 1033:00e0 (NEC Corporation) hcd.c: irq 10, pci mem d080d000 usb.c: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1 ehci-hcd.c: USB 2.0 support enabled, EHCI rev 0.95 hub.c: USB hub found hub.c: 5 ports detected > I'm curious why you aren't just adding the 2.4.19-pre7 patch from Marcelo. > That's the latest version, AFAIK, and it'd be a lot simpler ... :) I didn't want to bring in any more than required, this machine is the core of my home network (the rest is one windows desktop and two laptops but I can make it sound grand). > No, the connect-debounce stuff was an unrelated change to USB. Just wondered because I never saw that message when plugging into the new card's ports. > You'd hope the BIOS software writers would do something smarter > than that, wouldn't you? :) The kernel shouldn't care, but such > needless sharing of IRQ lines does affect interrupt latencies a bit. > (I suspect you don't want to look at my IRQ5 or IRQ11.) Yeah, does seem rather strange given that there are many unused lines. -- /------------------------------------+-------------------------\ |Stephen J. Gowdy | SLAC, MailStop 34, | |http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~gowdy/ | 2575 Sand Hill Road, | |http://calendar.yahoo.com/gowdy | Menlo Park CA 94025, USA | |EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Tel: +1 650 926 3144 | \------------------------------------+-------------------------/ _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-users
