On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 10:10:07AM -0700, Dan Shookowsky wrote: > That's kind of an interesting question regarding pilot-link. I > had pilot-link 9.5 installed from the Red Hat install, so I > thought that was the problem. I downloaded the latest > pilot-link tarball and ran through the .config;make;make install > steps, but it wouldn't replace the pilot-link that was installed > by the RPM. I eventually just removed the old RPM and I'm now > using pilot-link-11.3.
So 'pilot-xfer -v' shows the proper version number? If so, I'd suggest reading the HOWTO at pilot-link.org and if you still have problems, ask on the pilot-link mailing list. > I did see in the documentation that I should be using the Simple > protocol and that's what's referred to in the previous coldsync > log file by protocol=2. Huh? You need "protocol:net" or "protocol:simple" in your .coldsyncrc file. Are you using the latest version of this too? > I'd give up if someone just told me that this doesn't work in > Linux. The problem I have is that I'm one of the few people > having this problem. For everyone else, "it just works." Yes, it should work, but it doesn't look like it is a USB or kernel driver related problem. I would recommend the pilot-link or coldsync mailing lists instead of linux-usb-users. Good luck, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-users
