On Wednesday 31 December 2003 01:24 pm, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Ged Haywood wrote: > > SCSI-SCSI 2m 13s 20-30% CPU (partition to partition, same drive) > > SCSI-IDE 1m 11s 10-20% CPU > > IDE-IDE 4m 34s 10-20% CPU (partition to partition, same drive) > > ... > > > If you want to discuss this more we should take it off-list. > > That's a pity - I'd like to know the result of this discussion - but isn't > this mismatch between the expected and the factual due to the > "partition-to-partition" above, whereas initially 2 distinct drives were > assumed?
Actually this is what we do. We come up with some interesting subject and get everyone curious. Then we end it! > Thanks > Guennadi > --- > Guennadi Liakhovetski -- Steve __________________________________________________ You actually need to constantly be alert and willing to handle things, or life will find a way to get you good! ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-users
