On Sat, Nov 06, 2004, Norbert Nemec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've just purchased a USB-Scanner "Canon LIDE 35". Besides the problem > that this scanner is not yet supported by SANE (which will hopefully > change soon) I face a much more fundamental problem: > > The device does not show up when using 'lsusb'. The tool > 'sane-find-scanner' obviously uses the same source of information, as it > does not show any sign of the scanner either. > > Using 'usbview' on the other hand, correctly shows the device "CanoScan" > with all the correct settings. Also, doing 'cat /proc/bus/usb/devices' > gives me correct information about the scanner. > > My investigations show me, that both 'lsusb' and 'sane-find-scanner' are > linked to 'libusb', while 'usbview' seems to work without this library. > Might there be an error in libusb? > > Also, 'usbview' tells me, that the scanner is connected to the EHCI > controller, while all other USB-devices that I have are connected to UHCI
That's fine. EHCI is the USB 2.0 controller, UHCI is the USB 1.1 controller. > My system is Debian testing with all fairly up-to-date software. I'm assuming this is a 2.4 system? > Please CC me in an answer, I'm currently not subscribed to the list. Can you give us the output from /proc/bus/usb/devices and the output from 'ls -laR /proc/bus/usb' JE ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-users
