On Fri, 31 Dec 2004, David Relson wrote: > Actually, the current driver version is a _lot_ better. In fact the HD > is functioning well enough that I have successfully run e2fsck!
Now I'm really confused. Which driver versions are you comparing? Do you mean that 2.6.10 works better than 2.6.9? > After adding your debug patches, Adding the debug patches to which version? > I did a side by side compare with the > 2.6.10 transport.c and added the bits that seemed usable. Added the usable bits from which version to which version? > FWIW, I've > attached a pristine...current patch for what I've now got. Pristine which? Current starting from where and adding what? > It begins to look like whatever caused the 2.6.8.1's transport.c to have > problems has been fixed in 2.6.10. Didn't you just post, in your previous message, a log showing 2.6.8.1 working correctly? Which version was having all the problems? > I'll let you know as I learn more.. Does virgin 2.6.10 work okay? If not, when you add the second debugging patch what shows up in the log? Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-users
