Am Dienstag, den 26.04.2005, 11:21 -0400 schrieb Alan Stern: > > bcdUSB 1.10 > > > > ########## Looks like USB 1.1, does it? ############### > > Yup, it sure does. No question, this is a USB 1.1 device. > > > bDeviceClass 0 (Defined at Interface level) > > bDeviceSubClass 0 > > bDeviceProtocol 0 > > bMaxPacketSize0 8 > > idVendor 0x10d6 Actions Semiconductor Co., Ltd > > idProduct 0x1100 > > bcdDevice 1.00 > > iManufacturer 0 > > iProduct 1 USB 2.0(FS) FLASH DISK > > iSerial 2 USB 2.0(FS) FLASH DISK > > > > ###### this says USB 2.0, but this String can be changed by the vendor, or? > > ##### > > That's right, the string is set by the vendor. Note that it only claims > to be full speed (FS), however. That's not inconsistent, by the way; it's > perfectly legal for a USB-2.0 device not to support high-speed operation. > > There was another case reported recently, just like yours. The > manufacturer claimed the device was USB-2.0 but the descriptors said > otherwise. I don't remember the vendor or the device, but maybe you can > find out by searching through the mailing list archive.
Thanks. The device is a cheap usb mp3 player bought on ebay. Perhaps this hardware is sold under a lot of different names. -- Erik Tews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix _______________________________________________ Linux-usb-users@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-users
