Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am
> > just concerned that I have now seemingly addressed this issue for
> > cdrecord but that I may run up against similar problems with other
> > software. For example, should I be worried that the kernel support for
> > using dvd-ram in this drive may also try a >32768 transfer and I won't
> > have a handy dandy -ts option to fix it?
>
> It wasn't the kernel that tried to do the > 32768-byte transfer, it was
> cdrecord. In general the kernel tries to stay out of the way and let
> programs like cdrecord do what they want. It's up to the program to make
> sure it does the right thing.
libscg uses the official interface of the Linux kernel to query the maximum
DMA size. If the kernel returns an unsuitable value, it is not a problem
caused by cdrecord.
J�rg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) J�rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt12&alloc_id344&op=click
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-users
