On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Robert Marquardt wrote: > Alan Stern wrote: > > > The current strategy is to avoid vendor-specific interface classes and > > Microsoft RNDIS, and to use the first otherwise available configuration. > > (The numbering is ignored totally.) That's why you end up with the > > high-power config. > > Which is devastating. I now have a hi power device on a low power port. > Even Windows chooses the low power configuration on a low power port.
Feel free to contribute a patch that will select the correct configuration automatically. Or at least, will weed out the unsupportably-high-powered ones. You might want to search the linux-usb-devel mailing list archives; there was a discussion some months ago about the requirements for which config to select. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-users
