On 9/8/05, Matthew Dharm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 11:14:36AM -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote: > > I think I have found a possible bug: > > [...] > > I suppose the scsi code could be changed to guarantee that > > srb->request_buffer is page-aligned or cache-aligned, but that seems > > like the wrong solution for this bug. > > Fixing the SCSI layer is -exactly- the correct solution. The SCSI layer is > supposed to guarantee us that those buffers are suitable for DMA'ing, and > apparently it's violating that promise.
Thanks, I'll check on what buffer I'm actually getting, where it's allocated, and post back what I find, or how I fixed it. -- Jim Ramsay "Me fail English? That's unpossible!" ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-users
