On 7/20/06, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah yes, that would do it.  In fact, the correct approach is to make
> dBuffer dynamic, not stack-based.  That is, you should use kmalloc() to
> allocate the buffer space.

Yeah, indeed. Here we go:

-------------------------------------------
__u8 *dBuffer;
dBuffer = (__u8 *)kmalloc( MAX_INTEL_HEX_RECORD_LENGTH, GFP_KERNEL );
...
...
kfree( dBuffer );
------------------------------------------

That did the trick.

> You've got another mistake in the last argument.  The timeout value should
> be specified in milliseconds, not in jiffies.

Oh, yeah I see, thanks.

Kris

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Linux-usb-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-users

Reply via email to