On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Michael Schwarz wrote: > Yeah; But here was where I lacked confidence. I used to know every inch of > my kernel and my hardware, but, as previously stated, that was back in the > 2.2.x days. I wasn't confident that I could run my hardware with a > plain-vanilla kernel or that I could successfully roll my own working > 2.6.x kernel in a timely manner. But, of course, I understand why this is > a good idea.
It's not so hard to do, if you start from a known-good configuration. For instance, you could take the config your current distribution's kernel is built from and just use it, although it would take a long time to build because it includes so many drivers. Whittling it down to just the drivers you need would be tedious but not very difficult. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Linux-usb-users@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-users
