Hi David,
Answer (to quote David Brownell):
"it just grew that way"
Also, virtual root hubs came along much later.
I'd like to see it cleaned up (if possible),
but I'm thinking that 2.5 is the right time
to do this.
~Randy
___________________________________________________
|Randy Dunlap Intel Corp., DAL Sr. SW Engr.|
|randy.dunlap.at.intel.com 503-696-2055|
|NOTE: Any views presented here are mine alone |
|and may not represent the views of my employer. |
|_________________________________________________|
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Brownell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 9:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [linux-usb] virtual root hub question
>
>
> Looking at the OHCI code, I see some overlap with hub.h
> for constants (different names though) for hub commands,
> masks, and so on. There's some in the UHCI code too.
>
> My question: why? Why not just #include "hub.h" and stick to
> one set of constants, and less potential for errors? Better
> grepping?
>
> This looks like one of those "it just grew that way" things.
>
> - Dave
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
