> So, does it need a GPL statement in it to be usable by Linux > distributors? I'm guessing that it does. It needs some kind of license allowing them to distribute it, preferably to modify it providing they note they did so. There is a proposed GNU documentation license, and there are several 'opencontent' and other licenses. They seem to range from the perl docs 'If you want to change this mail me the changes' to 'I dont care'. Some of them restrict paper copies others dont. Its all up to the author. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [linux-usb] USB usability concerns for 2.4 Brad Hards
- Re: [linux-usb] USB usability concerns for 2.4 Pavel Machek
- Re: [linux-usb] USB usability concerns for 2.4 Alan Cox
- Re: [linux-usb] USB usability concerns for 2.4 David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb] USB usability concerns for 2.4 David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb] USB usability concerns for 2.4 Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: [linux-usb] USB usability concerns for 2.4 David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb] USB usability concerns for 2.4 Paul . Newman
- RE: [linux-usb] USB usability concerns for 2.4 Dunlap, Randy
- RE: [linux-usb] USB usability concerns for 2.4 Dunlap, Randy
- RE: [linux-usb] USB usability concerns for 2.4 Dunlap, Randy
- Re: [linux-usb] USB usability concerns for 2.4 David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb] USB usability concerns for 2.4 Alan Cox
- Re: [linux-usb] USB usability concerns for 2... David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb] USB usability concerns for 2.4 Brad Hards
- Re: [linux-usb] USB usability concerns for 2.4 Brad Hards
- RE: [linux-usb] USB usability concerns for 2.4 Dunlap, Randy
