Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
>
> Which kernel is this?
>
> I thought I removed that option from the Config.in (since the driver
> doesn't use it anymore) but apparentely not. Here's a patch to remove
> it. Randy, could you send this in your next batch?
>
> JE
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2000, Dunlap, Randy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bruce Tenison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2000 1:05 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: Dunlap, Randy
> > Subject: usbdevfs comparison
> >
> >
> > Hi everyone. Just performed a comparison by dumping Sting's Mercury
> > Falling CD to the Rio. Here's the results (using uhci.o with unlink
> > optimzations turned on) I seem to remember a uhci driver that was MUCH
> > faster at one time. Looks like usb-uhci is a bit faster and the usbdevfs
> > vs. kernel space very comparable
for me, doing bulk download with usbdevfs, uhci driver is MUCH slower
than usb-uhci.
the uhci driver seems to be limited to a few 4k packets per socond,
while the usb-uhci
seems to go full speed.
J.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
