> > There's other reason for that. One major is for ttyACM*,
> second is for
> > cuaACM*.
>
> I thought cua devices went away some time ago and are no
> longer needed?
> With the functionality replaced by O_NONBLOCK?
Pavel is correct about why I listed 166 & 167.
As for cua devices going away, they are still listed in
Documentation/devices.txt. That's what I based my
device numbers listing on.
~Randy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
