> Can you address Tom's comments?
My previous note did so, I think.
> And here are my comments:
>
> a. in proc_ioctl(), under "get input parameters", why no check
> to see if kmalloc() fails?
Oops (so to speak ;-). This was surely the "sketch" I promised!
> b. in proc_ioctl(), under "ioctl to the driver which has claimed a
> given interface", the code makes an assumption that interface
> numbers are linear/consecutive (I think). JE has found this not
> to be the case (I believe on the cpia camera), although this
> is out of spec IIRC. That's why there is a usb_ifnum_to_if()
> in usb.c.
Good to know. I'll call that instead of making that assumption.
- Dave
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
