Most likely, the device is busy doing other things. While you are
guaranteed bus bandwidth, you are not guaranteed to have a responsive
device.
Matt Dharm
On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 11:27:28AM -0300, Claudio Matsuoka wrote:
>
> What would you point as the most likely cause for a usb_control_msg()
> returning -ETIMEDOUT? Shouldn't control transfers be given a guaranteed
> bus allocation?
>
> In this case an isochronous transfer (from the OV511) is taking place.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Engineer, QCP Inc. Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I see you've been reading alt.sex.chubby.sheep voraciously.
-- Tanya
User Friendly, 11/24/97
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]