Johannes Erdfelt wrote: > Well, I'd like to simulate a disconnect() and probe() for all interfaces > that the calling process doesn't own. Does that sound better? That has the advantage that a driver cannot be confused as it has to handle spontaneous disconnects anyway. The ioctl then allows for (automated) testing of driver's ability to handle this. So this is ok for me. Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [linux-usb] [patch] new usb_reset_device semantics + ioct... Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: [linux-usb] [patch] new usb_reset_device semanti... Greg KH
- Re: [linux-usb] [patch] new usb_reset_device sem... Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: [linux-usb] [patch] new usb_reset_device... Greg KH
- Re: [linux-usb] [patch] new usb_reset_de... Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: [linux-usb] [patch] new usb_reset_device semanti... Thomas Sailer
- Re: [linux-usb] [patch] new usb_reset_device sem... David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb] [patch] new usb_reset_device... Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: [linux-usb] [patch] new usb_reset_device sem... Johannes Erdfelt
- RE: [linux-usb] [patch] new usb_reset_device... Thomas Sailer
- RE: [linux-usb] [patch] new usb_reset_device semanti... Dunlap, Randy
