> I think you're way of base here. Copyright doesn't cover intentions, > it covers expression in a tangible form. So the intention is irrelevant, > what is expressed in the file is what's relevant. If the file doesn't > contain GPL code, then in itself it isn't subject to the GPL.
Will all the wannabe lawyers please go and read some basic copyright law then come back. It depends whether your file is a derivative work, not whether it contains GPL code. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
