On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 01:28:46PM -0700, Julius Werner wrote: > >> Is it just > >> for (prev = *first; prev; prev = prev->next) > >> xhci_segment_free(xhci, prev); > >> > >> ? > > > > Yeah, that seems cleaner. > > > > Sarah Sharp > > I can submit it that way if you want, but I would advise against it. This way > you access the prev pointer after it has been freed already… that's probably > not a problem in the current kernel, but it depends on how the underlying > memory is managed and is generally just not a good idea in my opinion.
Yep, you're right. I'll take the second patch you submitted, thanks. Sarah Sharp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
