On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 2:04 AM, Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng....@mediatek.com> wrote: > Hi Rob, > On Tue, 2018-05-01 at 09:24 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 03:45:28PM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote: >> > Add a DT binding documentation of XS-PHY for MediaTek SoCs >> > with USB3.1 GEN2 controller
[...] >> > + reg = <0 0x11c43000 0 0x0200>; >> > + mediatek,src-ref-clk-mhz = <26>; >> > + mediatek,src-coef = <17>; >> > + #address-cells = <2>; >> > + #size-cells = <2>; >> >> Really need 64-bit sizes? > Just an example, 32-bit is also ok, but it's better to use the same > value as the root node Why is it better? It is unnecessary bloat and it is better to limit the range of child nodes using ranges. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
