On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:02:07AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Piergiorgio Sartor wrote:
>
> > > Here's an idea. This just occurred to me. Maybe when the driver is
> > > waiting for the async schedule to turn off, new QH's should not be
> > > added to the schedule. The driver could wait and add them after the
> > > schedule was off. I didn't do it that way because it would slow things
> > > down and add complexity, but maybe that's what the nVidia hardware
> > > needs.
> >
> > How difficult is it?
> > Would it be possible to have as a patch I could try?
>
> Instead of doing this, I wrote a simpler patch that removes the limit
> on the number of polls. It also writes a debugging message whenever
> more than 20 ms of polling is needed, so we can see what your
> controller is actually doing.
Hi Alan,
thanks for the patch, I applied it and tested.
I've bad news...
Unless I made some mistake (which can always be), I did not
see any of the logs of this patch in the output, despite
having seen the problem occuring (this time I used "cpuburn"
to overload the system).
The only reasonable log was like the previous one:
[ 248.833978] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0b.1: alan start cur time 4294916032 last scan
4294885464
[ 248.833991] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0b.1: command 10035 cmd reg 10075 io watchdog 1
async count 10
[ 248.833998] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0b.1: async list:
[ 248.834006] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0b.1: qh ffff880149fcfe00 hw ffff8800af800000
dma af800000 next ffff880146d70380 hw_next af8009c2
[ 248.834013] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0b.1: qh ffff880146d70380 hw ffff8800af8009c0
dma af8009c0 next ffff880146c95b00 hw_next af800a82
[ 248.834020] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0b.1: qh ffff880146c95b00 hw ffff8800af800a80
dma af800a80 next ffff880149b51f00 hw_next af800cc2
[ 248.834027] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0b.1: qh ffff880149b51f00 hw ffff8800af800cc0
dma af800cc0 next ffff880145d17e80 hw_next af800f02
[ 248.834033] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0b.1: qh ffff880145d17e80 hw ffff8800af800f00
dma af800f00 next ffff88013d137180 hw_next af800c02
[ 248.834040] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0b.1: qh ffff88013d137180 hw ffff8800af800c00
dma af800c00 next ffff880148bc0000 hw_next af800d82
[ 248.834046] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0b.1: qh ffff880148bc0000 hw ffff8800af800d80
dma af800d80 next ffff8801410f9f00 hw_next af800b42
[ 248.834053] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0b.1: qh ffff8801410f9f00 hw ffff8800af800b40
dma af800b40 next ffff880147b8bc80 hw_next af8007e2
[ 248.834060] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0b.1: qh ffff880147b8bc80 hw ffff8800af8007e0
dma af8007e0 next ffff880140b49180 hw_next af800e42
[ 248.834066] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0b.1: qh ffff880140b49180 hw ffff8800af800e40
dma af800e40 next ffff880141f8ac00 hw_next af8008a2
[ 248.834073] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0b.1: qh ffff880141f8ac00 hw ffff8800af8008a0
dma af8008a0 next (null) hw_next af800002
[ 248.834080] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0b.1: This qh link time 4294885466 enqueue time
4294885466 td token 1f8c80 ov token 0
[ 248.834087] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0b.1: qh ffff880146d70380 naf800a82 info
42002210 40000000 qtd af81ccc0
[ 248.834095] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0b.1: overlay td ffff8800af8009d0 nae2531e0
00000001 t00000000 p0=af87fa9f
[ 248.834103] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0b.1: dma ae2531e0 td ffff8800ae2531e0
naf81ef60 00000001 t001f8c80 p0=af87fa80
[ 248.834111] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0b.1: dummy af81ef60 td ffff8800af81ef60
n00000001 00000001 t00000040 p0=00000000
[ 248.845154] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0b.1: giveback urb ffff88014980dcc0 actual 0
[ 248.845162] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0b.1: alan end
Note that there was not anymore the log line before "alan start".
I suspect the previous error was something else, maybe something
it happens seldom, since sometimes I saw some timeout errors, but
they were almost always not a problem.
Any ideas?
Thanks again,
bye,
pg
>
> Alan Stern
>
>
>
>
> Index: usb-3.7/drivers/usb/host/ehci-timer.c
> ===================================================================
> --- usb-3.7.orig/drivers/usb/host/ehci-timer.c
> +++ usb-3.7/drivers/usb/host/ehci-timer.c
> @@ -113,14 +113,15 @@ static void ehci_poll_ASS(struct ehci_hc
>
> if (want != actual) {
>
> - /* Poll again later, but give up after about 20 ms */
> - if (ehci->ASS_poll_count++ < 20) {
> - ehci_enable_event(ehci, EHCI_HRTIMER_POLL_ASS, true);
> - return;
> - }
> - ehci_dbg(ehci, "Waited too long for the async schedule status
> (%x/%x), giving up\n",
> - want, actual);
> + /* Poll again later */
> + ehci_enable_event(ehci, EHCI_HRTIMER_POLL_ASS, true);
> + ++ehci->ASS_poll_count;
> + return;
> }
> +
> + if (ehci->ASS_poll_count > 20)
> + ehci_dbg(ehci, "ASS poll count reached %d\n",
> + ehci->ASS_poll_count);
> ehci->ASS_poll_count = 0;
>
> /* The status is up-to-date; restart or stop the schedule as needed */
> @@ -159,14 +160,14 @@ static void ehci_poll_PSS(struct ehci_hc
>
> if (want != actual) {
>
> - /* Poll again later, but give up after about 20 ms */
> - if (ehci->PSS_poll_count++ < 20) {
> - ehci_enable_event(ehci, EHCI_HRTIMER_POLL_PSS, true);
> - return;
> - }
> - ehci_dbg(ehci, "Waited too long for the periodic schedule
> status (%x/%x), giving up\n",
> - want, actual);
> + /* Poll again later */
> + ehci_enable_event(ehci, EHCI_HRTIMER_POLL_PSS, true);
> + return;
> }
> +
> + if (ehci->PSS_poll_count > 20)
> + ehci_dbg(ehci, "PSS poll count reached %d\n",
> + ehci->PSS_poll_count);
> ehci->PSS_poll_count = 0;
>
> /* The status is up-to-date; restart or stop the schedule as needed */
--
piergiorgio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
