On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 09:56:42PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > For dove, the patches are basically what I had proposed back in > 2015 when all other ARMv6/ARMv7 machines became part of a single > kernel build. I don't know what the state is mach-dove support is, > compared to the DT based support in mach-mvebu for the same > hardware. If they are functionally the same, we could also just > remove mach-dove rather than applying my patches.
Well, the good news is that I'm down to a small board support file for the Dove Cubox now - but the bad news is, that there's still a board support file necessary to support everything the Dove SoC has to offer. Even for a DT based Dove Cubox, I'm still using mach-dove, but it may be possible to drop most of mach-dove now. Without spending a lot of time digging through it, it's impossible to really know. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up