On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 15:39:33 +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 06:01:45PM -0400, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote: > > I noticed that when I use "lsusb -v" on a UAS-enabled drive enclosure, > > the bInterfaceProtocol line for #80/0x50 has a "protocol name" label but the > > one for #98/0x62 does not: [...] > > So...I was wondering if there was any particular reason that protocol > > 98 isn't included in the usb.ids file? > > No one got around to it? Feel free to submit a patch to the web site > that handles these to upate it.
Thanks for your reply. I did look there first, but because the "Bulk-Only" and "UAS" protocol names seem so similar but the UAS name hasn't been created for several years now, I started to wonder if there was a more complicated background story behind the situation. Anyway, for what it's worth there was a submission for the UAS protocal name on the USB ID website in 2013 and I submitted another one a couple weeks ago, but so far both are still showing up as grey (which seems to indicate that it's still pending approval by "an admin"). https://usb-ids.gowdy.us/read/UC/08/06/62 I'll see if I can track down contact information for the admin(s) there. Nathan
