On 9/3/19 9:58 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 04:21:27PM +0800, JC Kuo wrote:
>> Tegra194 XUSB host controller has rearranged mailbox registers. This
>> commit makes mailbox registers address a part of "soc" data so that
>> xhci-tegra driver can be used for Tegra194.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: JC Kuo <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c
>> index dafc65911fc0..247b08ca49ee 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c
>> @@ -42,19 +42,18 @@
>> #define XUSB_CFG_CSB_BASE_ADDR 0x800
>>
>> /* FPCI mailbox registers */
>> -#define XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_CMD 0x0e4
>> +/* XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_CMD */
>> #define MBOX_DEST_FALC BIT(27)
>> #define MBOX_DEST_PME BIT(28)
>> #define MBOX_DEST_SMI BIT(29)
>> #define MBOX_DEST_XHCI BIT(30)
>> #define MBOX_INT_EN BIT(31)
>> -#define XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_DATA_IN 0x0e8
>> +/* XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_DATA_IN and XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_DATA_OUT */
>> #define CMD_DATA_SHIFT 0
>> #define CMD_DATA_MASK 0xffffff
>> #define CMD_TYPE_SHIFT 24
>> #define CMD_TYPE_MASK 0xff
>> -#define XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_DATA_OUT 0x0ec
>> -#define XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER 0x0f0
>> +/* XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER */
>> #define MBOX_OWNER_NONE 0
>> #define MBOX_OWNER_FW 1
>> #define MBOX_OWNER_SW 2
>> @@ -146,6 +145,13 @@ struct tegra_xusb_phy_type {
>> unsigned int num;
>> };
>>
>> +struct tega_xusb_mbox_regs {
>> + unsigned int cmd;
>> + unsigned int data_in;
>> + unsigned int data_out;
>> + unsigned int owner;
>
> Shouldn't these all be u8 values?
>
These data members represent register offset in Tegra XUSB FPCI area. Size of
FPCI area is 0x1000, so it is possible for future Tegra XUSB to have mailbox
registers allocated to somewhere > 0x100.
>> +};
>> +
>> struct tegra_xusb_soc {
>> const char *firmware;
>> const char * const *supply_names;
>> @@ -160,6 +166,8 @@ struct tegra_xusb_soc {
>> } usb2, ulpi, hsic, usb3;
>> } ports;
>>
>> + struct tega_xusb_mbox_regs mbox;
>> +
>> bool scale_ss_clock;
>> bool has_ipfs;
>> };
>> @@ -395,15 +403,15 @@ static int tegra_xusb_mbox_send(struct tegra_xusb
>> *tegra,
>> * ACK/NAK messages.
>> */
>> if (!(msg->cmd == MBOX_CMD_ACK || msg->cmd == MBOX_CMD_NAK)) {
>> - value = fpci_readl(tegra, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER);
>> + value = fpci_readl(tegra, tegra->soc->mbox.owner);
>> if (value != MBOX_OWNER_NONE) {
>> dev_err(tegra->dev, "mailbox is busy\n");
>> return -EBUSY;
>> }
>>
>> - fpci_writel(tegra, MBOX_OWNER_SW, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER);
>> + fpci_writel(tegra, MBOX_OWNER_SW, tegra->soc->mbox.owner);
>>
>> - value = fpci_readl(tegra, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER);
>> + value = fpci_readl(tegra, tegra->soc->mbox.owner);
>> if (value != MBOX_OWNER_SW) {
>> dev_err(tegra->dev, "failed to acquire mailbox\n");
>> return -EBUSY;
>> @@ -413,17 +421,17 @@ static int tegra_xusb_mbox_send(struct tegra_xusb
>> *tegra,
>> }
>>
>> value = tegra_xusb_mbox_pack(msg);
>> - fpci_writel(tegra, value, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_DATA_IN);
>> + fpci_writel(tegra, value, tegra->soc->mbox.data_in);
>>
>> - value = fpci_readl(tegra, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_CMD);
>> + value = fpci_readl(tegra, tegra->soc->mbox.cmd);
>> value |= MBOX_INT_EN | MBOX_DEST_FALC;
>> - fpci_writel(tegra, value, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_CMD);
>> + fpci_writel(tegra, value, tegra->soc->mbox.cmd);
>>
>> if (wait_for_idle) {
>> unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(250);
>>
>> while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
>> - value = fpci_readl(tegra, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER);
>> + value = fpci_readl(tegra, tegra->soc->mbox.owner);
>> if (value == MBOX_OWNER_NONE)
>> break;
>>
>> @@ -431,7 +439,7 @@ static int tegra_xusb_mbox_send(struct tegra_xusb *tegra,
>> }
>>
>> if (time_after(jiffies, timeout))
>> - value = fpci_readl(tegra, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER);
>> + value = fpci_readl(tegra, tegra->soc->mbox.owner);
>>
>> if (value != MBOX_OWNER_NONE)
>> return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> @@ -598,16 +606,16 @@ static irqreturn_t tegra_xusb_mbox_thread(int irq,
>> void *data)
>>
>> mutex_lock(&tegra->lock);
>>
>> - value = fpci_readl(tegra, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_DATA_OUT);
>> + value = fpci_readl(tegra, tegra->soc->mbox.data_out);
>> tegra_xusb_mbox_unpack(&msg, value);
>>
>> - value = fpci_readl(tegra, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_CMD);
>> + value = fpci_readl(tegra, tegra->soc->mbox.cmd);
>> value &= ~MBOX_DEST_SMI;
>> - fpci_writel(tegra, value, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_CMD);
>> + fpci_writel(tegra, value, tegra->soc->mbox.cmd);
>>
>> /* clear mailbox owner if no ACK/NAK is required */
>> if (!tegra_xusb_mbox_cmd_requires_ack(msg.cmd))
>> - fpci_writel(tegra, MBOX_OWNER_NONE, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER);
>> + fpci_writel(tegra, MBOX_OWNER_NONE, tegra->soc->mbox.owner);
>>
>> tegra_xusb_mbox_handle(tegra, &msg);
>>
>> @@ -1365,6 +1373,12 @@ static const struct tegra_xusb_soc tegra124_soc = {
>> },
>> .scale_ss_clock = true,
>> .has_ipfs = true,
>> + .mbox = {
>> + .cmd = 0xe4,
>> + .data_in = 0xe8,
>> + .data_out = 0xec,
>> + .owner = 0xf0,
>> + },
>> };
>> MODULE_FIRMWARE("nvidia/tegra124/xusb.bin");
>>
>> @@ -1397,6 +1411,12 @@ static const struct tegra_xusb_soc tegra210_soc = {
>> },
>> .scale_ss_clock = false,
>> .has_ipfs = true,
>> + .mbox = {
>> + .cmd = 0xe4,
>> + .data_in = 0xe8,
>> + .data_out = 0xec,
>> + .owner = 0xf0,
>> + },
>> };
>> MODULE_FIRMWARE("nvidia/tegra210/xusb.bin");
>>
>> @@ -1422,6 +1442,12 @@ static const struct tegra_xusb_soc tegra186_soc = {
>> },
>> .scale_ss_clock = false,
>> .has_ipfs = false,
>> + .mbox = {
>> + .cmd = 0xe4,
>> + .data_in = 0xe8,
>> + .data_out = 0xec,
>> + .owner = 0xf0,
>> + },
>
> This did not change any existing functionality, is there a follow-on
> patch somewhere that takes advantage of this change to enable different
> hardware? Otherwise this doesn't seem worth it.
>
Yes, I will submit another patch to enable Tegra194 XHCI. It will make use of
this patch to declare Tegra194 XUSB mailbox registers as:
.mbox = {
.cmd = 0x68,
.data_in = 0x6c,
.data_out = 0x70,
.owner = 0x74,
},
Thanks for review.
JC
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
