On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:45:28PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 10/2/19 11:29 AM, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 09:36:39AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > port->cap->type used to be the role provided by the low level driver. > > > That was static, and it was not possible to override it. It did not > > > resemble the current port type, or a configured port type, it resembled > > > port capabilities. > > > > > > Your code changes that, meaning even if the low level driver (effectively > > > the hardware) states that it can not support DRP, it is now configurable > > > anyway. That seems to me like a substantial change to the original meaning > > > of this attribute. > > > > > > Effectiv ely there are now three values, > > > - port->port_type the current port tyle > > > - port->fixed_type the type selected by the user > > > - port->cap->type the type provided by low level code, > > > now no longer available / used > > > > > > Even if the low level driver (hardware) says that it can not support > > > TYPEC_PORT_DRP, that can be overwritten by the user. Maybe there is a > > > good reason for that, but I don't see it, sorry. > > > > No, that was not my intention. Clearly there is a bug in my code. > > > > > Maybe it would make sense to introduce port->fixed_type in a separate > > > patch. > > > As part of that patch you could explain why port->cap->type, ie a > > > reflection > > > of the port capabilities, is no longer needed. > > > > Or, I could make this really simple. I could just copy the content of > > the cap as is to another struct typec_capability during port > > registration. My goal is really just remove the need for the device > > drivers keep the struct typec_capability instance if they don't need > > it, and I don't need to remove the cap member to achieve that. > > > > Maybe just use devm_kmemdup() ?
For example. thanks, -- heikki
