On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 03:09:19PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> 
> > > > +                     status = usb_disable_function_remotewakeup(udev);
> > >
> > > Don't call that function here.  Just put the code here and run it
> > > directly.  Then you can get rid of the old function.
> > >
> > usb_disable_function_remotewakeup???? is  just introduced at last patch to
> > resolve too more  indentation.
> > So it's ok to remove it so quickly ? Or I should merge these two patches?
> 
> I thought the purpose of patch 1/2 was to have something that could be 
> applied to the -stable kernels.  Isn't that what Sarah asked for?  A 
> short fix, followed by another patch that would clean up the mess.

Yes, I wanted patch 1/2 to be applied to stable kernels.

Sarah Sharp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to