Hello.
On 09-08-2012 18:38, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
dma_controller_create is called only from musb_init_controller
which is __devint so annotate dma_controller_create also with
__devint.
fixes the warn
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.devinit.text+0x6fa8): Section mismatch in reference from
the function musb_init_controller() to the function
.init.text:dma_controller_create()
The function __devinit musb_init_controller() references
a function __init dma_controller_create().
If dma_controller_create is only used by musb_init_controller then
annotate dma_controller_create with a matching annotation.
Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <[email protected]>
---
I wonder if this should be ported to 3.4+ stable kernels which contain the
commit e9e8c85e69310141d78daaecd6a56138700ac317 (usb: musb: make modules
behave better) which has triggered the warning above. Although, as DMA drivers
still can only be built in-kernel, it's only the warning but not the actual
oops. Felipe, what do you think?
drivers/usb/musb/cppi_dma.c | 2 +-
drivers/usb/musb/musb_dma.h | 2 +-
drivers/usb/musb/musbhsdma.c | 2 +-
drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c | 2 +-
drivers/usb/musb/ux500_dma.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/cppi_dma.c b/drivers/usb/musb/cppi_dma.c
index 8637c1f..e19da82 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/musb/cppi_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/musb/cppi_dma.c
@@ -1316,7 +1316,7 @@ irqreturn_t cppi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
}
/* Instantiate a software object representing a DMA controller. */
-struct dma_controller *__init
+struct dma_controller *__devinit
dma_controller_create(struct musb *musb, void __iomem *mregs)
{
struct cppi *controller;
diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_dma.h b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_dma.h
index 3a97c4e..24d3921 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_dma.h
+++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_dma.h
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ struct dma_controller {
extern void musb_dma_completion(struct musb *musb, u8 epnum, u8 transmit);
-extern struct dma_controller *__init
+extern struct dma_controller *__devinit
dma_controller_create(struct musb *, void __iomem *);
extern void dma_controller_destroy(struct dma_controller *);
diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musbhsdma.c b/drivers/usb/musb/musbhsdma.c
index 57a6085..444b9ee 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/musb/musbhsdma.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musbhsdma.c
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ void dma_controller_destroy(struct dma_controller *c)
kfree(controller);
}
-struct dma_controller *__init
+struct dma_controller *__devinit
dma_controller_create(struct musb *musb, void __iomem *base)
{
struct musb_dma_controller *controller;
diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c b/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c
index b67b4bc..53e2596 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c
@@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ void dma_controller_destroy(struct dma_controller *c)
kfree(tusb_dma);
}
-struct dma_controller *__init
+struct dma_controller *__devinit
dma_controller_create(struct musb *musb, void __iomem *base)
{
void __iomem *tbase = musb->ctrl_base;
diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/ux500_dma.c b/drivers/usb/musb/ux500_dma.c
index d05c7fb..639d58e 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/musb/ux500_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/musb/ux500_dma.c
@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ void dma_controller_destroy(struct dma_controller *c)
kfree(controller);
}
-struct dma_controller *__init
+struct dma_controller *__devinit
dma_controller_create(struct musb *musb, void __iomem *base)
{
struct ux500_dma_controller *controller;
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html