On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:24:58PM +0800, Chao Xie wrote:
>> The clock numbers and names are depent of SOCes,
>
> No they aren't. The clock names used to describe them in your documentation
> may vary, but their _purpose_ for the sake of the device will be fixed -
> and you should name them appropriately from the _device_ point of view.
>
> Not the SoC point of view. That way leads to total madness. We've
> proven this over the years that we've had the clk API and people have
> come up with trash implementations that do that crap. After many
> years of struggling, they've seen the light and fixed their shite up
> to work the way I originally intended, and... instantly benefited from
> it.
Yes, you are right, and you explained it very clearly.. I understand
what you said.
Our SOC document is lack of this kind of inoformation. I will talk
with the desgin engneer to make clear it, and make a new version of
patches.
Thanks for your review and comments.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
