On Thu, 14 Mar 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi Alan, > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 05:53:04PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: > > Hello Felipe Balbi: > > > > I have communicate with related member of net2272 and net2280. > > net2272 and net2280 belong to PLX Tech Corporation. > > they say: "PLX is not longer maintain these drivers". > > (it means: they can not help us to test this patch). > > please see the FWD mail at the bottom for more details. > > > > next: > > I want to broadcast our test demand within [email protected]. > > is it suitable to do it ? > > if it is suitable: > > the next work flow is: > > I will write a [Cooperation] patch. > > and then send it to you (just reply this mail) to get a check. > > and send to [email protected], after pass checking. > > is it ok ? > > do you have net2272 and net2280 avaiable which you could help us out > testing this patch ?
I have a net2280. Which patch do you want me to test? The two of you have come up with two different versions. BTW, the current state of the code is highly suspicious-looking. stop_activity() sets "driver" but never uses it. Your comment that the driver needs to be notified about a Reset interrupt is certainly correct. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
