On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 02:56:45PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Greg KH wrote: > > > This patch fails to apply to my usb-next branch, after the 4 previous > > patches were applied: > > > > checking file drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c > > Hunk #2 FAILED at 123. > > Hunk #3 succeeded at 545 (offset -8 lines). > > Hunk #4 succeeded at 557 (offset -8 lines). > > Hunk #5 succeeded at 945 (offset -8 lines). > > 1 out of 5 hunks FAILED > > checking file drivers/usb/host/ehci-sched.c > > > > Any ideas? I can't apply the rest of them, so can you fix this up and > > just resend this, and the remaining patches? > > The problem is that I do my development in a "work" branch that > includes both of your usb-linus and usb-next branches, merged together. > Or if you want to put it another way, I do my development in a single > branch that includes -stable and -current material as well as stuff for > -next. It seems foolish not to do this, since the -next patches will > eventually have to merge into a kernel that includes the others -- not > to mention that some of the -next work _depends_ on the other changes. > > In particular, this patch was based on a kernel that already has commit > feca7746d5d9 applied -- that commit is in your usb-linus branch but not > usb-next. That explains why you couldn't apply this patch; it touches > some of the same code as feca7746d5d9. > > How should we handle this?
Ok, I applied your ehci patch to my usb-linus branch and merged it into usb-next, and I know I got the merge wrong for the ehci watchdog logic. So if you could send me a patch fixing that up, and then resend these remaining patches, we should be all set, right? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
