On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:22:27PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 03/22/2013 06:52 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> 
> >>>fix the following sparse warnings:
> >>>drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c:2063:13: warning: Using plain integer as NULL 
> >>>pointer
> >>>drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c:2321:68: warning: Using plain integer as NULL 
> >>>pointer
> >>>drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c:2349:68: warning: Using plain integer as NULL 
> >>>pointer
> >>>drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c:2371:68: warning: Using plain integer as NULL 
> >>>pointer
> >>>Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>
> >>>---
> >>>  drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c | 8 ++++----
> >>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>>diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c
> >>>index 691cc65..e869188 100644
> >>>--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c
> >>>+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/net2280.c
> >>>@@ -2060,7 +2060,7 @@ static void handle_ep_small (struct net2280_ep *ep)
> >>>           return;
> >>>
> >>>   /* manual DMA queue advance after short OUT */
> >>>-  if (likely (ep->dma != 0)) {
> >>>+  if (likely (ep->dma)) {
> >>>           if (t & (1 << SHORT_PACKET_TRANSFERRED_INTERRUPT)) {
> >>>                   u32     count;
> >>>                   int     stopped = ep->stopped;
> >>>@@ -2318,7 +2318,7 @@ static void handle_stat0_irqs (struct net2280 *dev, 
> >>>u32 stat)
> >>>                   /* hw handles device and interface status */
> >>>                   if (u.r.bRequestType != (USB_DIR_IN|USB_RECIP_ENDPOINT))
> >>>                           goto delegate;
> >>>-                  if ((e = get_ep_by_addr (dev, w_index)) == 0
> >>>+                  if ((e = get_ep_by_addr (dev, w_index)) == NULL
> >>>                                   || w_length > 2)
> >>>                           goto do_stall;
> >>>
> >>>@@ -2346,7 +2346,7 @@ static void handle_stat0_irqs (struct net2280 *dev, 
> >>>u32 stat)
> >>>                   if (w_value != USB_ENDPOINT_HALT
> >>>                                   || w_length != 0)
> >>>                           goto do_stall;
> >>>-                  if ((e = get_ep_by_addr (dev, w_index)) == 0)
> >>>+                  if ((e = get_ep_by_addr (dev, w_index)) == NULL)
> >>>                           goto do_stall;
> >>>                   if (e->wedged) {
> >>>                           VDEBUG(dev, "%s wedged, halt not cleared\n",
> >>>@@ -2368,7 +2368,7 @@ static void handle_stat0_irqs (struct net2280 *dev, 
> >>>u32 stat)
> >>>                   if (w_value != USB_ENDPOINT_HALT
> >>>                                   || w_length != 0)
> >>>                           goto do_stall;
> >>>-                  if ((e = get_ep_by_addr (dev, w_index)) == 0)
> >>>+                  if ((e = get_ep_by_addr (dev, w_index)) == NULL)
> >>>                           goto do_stall;
> >>>                   if (e->ep.name == ep0name)
> >>>                           goto do_stall;
> >>    Did you run the patch thru checkpatch.pl or did you intentionally
> >>leave spaces between function/macro names and (?
> >patch was written to fix the sparse warning, not the checkpatch errors
> >which are all over this driver. Fixing one instance alone would make no
> >difference.
> 
>     However, isn't there a formal requirement that a patch doesn't cause
>  checkpatch.pl to complain?

this patch didn't cause checkpatch.pl to complain. Run checkpatch.pl on
the file and you'll see the complaint is already there

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to