On Monday 25 March 2013, Alan Stern wrote:
> >
> > + if (!dev->dev.platform_data) {
> > + dev->dev.platform_data = &ehci_platform_defaults;
> > + dev->dev.dma_mask = &dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
> > + dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
>
> In view of Felipe's comment, shouldn't these last two lines be
> controlled by dev->dev.of_node != NULL instead?
We could do that, or alternatively like this
if (!dev->dev.platform_data) {
dev->dev.platform_data = &ehci_platform_defaults;
if (!dev->dev.dma_mask)
dev->dev.dma_mask = &dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
if (!dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask)
dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
which would have the additional advantage that platforms can then
call platform_device_register_resndata() to create the device
and get a reasonable default dma mask (EHCI should always have
32 bit DMA, unless the platform is really screwed), rather than
statically declaring platform devices.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
