Hello.
On 05/31/2013 10:38 PM, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
From: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
---
drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c
b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c
index 4d64541..48c446b 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c
[...]
@@ -140,19 +139,21 @@ static int ci13xxx_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
[...]
+ phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(&pdev->dev, "fsl,usbphy", 0);
+
Empty line is not really needed here, don't you think?
+ if (PTR_ERR(phy) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
Hm, can PTR_ERR() be called on non-error pointers? Seems so...
+ ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
+ goto err_clk;
+ }
+
+ if (!IS_ERR(phy)) {
+ ret = usb_phy_init(phy);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to init phy: %d\n", ret);
+ goto err_clk;
}
+
+ data->phy = phy;
}
Shouldn't this come first instead, with the above PTR_ERR()
condition in
the *else* branch?
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
