On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 02:01:27PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Jul 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:53:53PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > > > > > I see. Doesn't the mass-storage gadget also use delayed status when > > > > > > going into the _un_configured state? > > > > > > > > > > no it doesn't, we bail out early if config number is zero, look at > > > > > composite.c and you'll see in case of configuration zero, we just make > > > > > sure to disable all endpoints and don't call ->set_alt(): > > > > > > > > This is my fault, for not being more familiar with the composite > > > > framework, and no doubt I will regret asking this, but... > > > > > > > > Doesn't that approach leave the function drivers sitting around with > > > > all their resources still allocated? When do those resources get > > > > deallocated? When the gadget disconnects from the host? > > > > > > which resources are you talking about ? Endpoints ? ->disable() should > > > make sure to disable the endpoints, but it will only free the endpoints > > > when the gadget driver is unbound. > > > > > > struct usb_requests will also be freed at ->disable() time. > > > > > > Does this answer your question ? > > > > Yeah, I was mainly wondering about the usb_requests. > > is this a signal for "you're good to go with your fix" ? :-)
Sure, go ahead. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
