On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 09:18:22AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Felipe Balbi <[email protected]> [130920 08:52]:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 01:18:23PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> > > The platform data bits can be inferred from the other members of
> > > struct usbhs_phy_data. So get rid of the platform_data member.
> > > 
> > > Build the platform data for the PHY device in usbhs_init_phys() instead.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Tony, do I get your Acked-by here and all following arch/arm/mach-omap2*
> > patches in this series ?
> 
> If you can merge just this series without the .dts changes
> into an immutable topic branch against let's say v3.12-rc2
> when it comes out, then yes I can ack them:
> 
> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
> 
> That way I can also pull in the topic branch as needed to
> avoid self inflicted merge conflicts ;) And Benoit can
> set up a separate .dts branch based on your branch to make
> sure the dependencies are in place before merging that one
> upstream.

Alright, i'll put this in my todo for next week.

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to