Hi,

On Wednesday, October 02, 2013 10:38:58 AM Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2013, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> 
> > Maybe it would make sense to cleanup ohci_suspend() first (before adding
> > new ohci_suspend() users) and remove unused do_wakeup parameter?
> 
> Not possible.  The do_wakeup parameter is part of a function prototype
> shared by other callback routines (such as ehci_suspend()) that _do_
> use the parameter.

If you mean ohci-pci.c usage (which is currently the only usage of
ohci_suspend() looking at the latest -next kernel) than it is enough
to add a simple wrapper for it in ohci-pci.c:

...
static int ohci_pci_suspend(struct usb_hcd *hcd, bool do_wakeup)
{
        ohci_suspend(hcd);
}
...
    ohci_pci_hc_driver.pci_suspend = ohci_pci_suspend;
...


Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to