On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 04:27:26PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 10/16/2013 04:10 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> > Hi roger,
> >
> > On Wednesday 16 October 2013 06:33 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >> Hi Kishon,
> >>
> >> On 10/15/2013 10:54 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> >>> There can be systems which does not have a external usb_phy, so get
> >>> usb_phy only if dt data indicates the presence of PHY in the case of dt
> >>> boot or
> >>> if platform_data indicates the presence of PHY. Also remove checking if
> >>> return value is -ENXIO since it's now changed to always enable usb_phy
> >>> layer.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kis...@ti.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> In usb_get_phy_by_phandle, index 0 always refers to usb2 phy and index 1
> >>> always
> >>> refers to usb3 phy. Since we've lived so long with this, this patch will
> >>> make
> >>> an assumption that if only one entry is populated in *usb-phy* property,
> >>> it will
> >>> be usb2 phy and the next entry will be usb3 phy.
> >>>
> >>> drivers/usb/dwc3/Kconfig | 1 +
> >>> drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 72
> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> >>> drivers/usb/dwc3/platform_data.h | 2 ++
> >>> 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/dwc3/Kconfig
> >>> index 70fc430..8e385b4 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/Kconfig
> >>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/Kconfig
> >>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> >>> config USB_DWC3
> >>> tristate "DesignWare USB3 DRD Core Support"
> >>> depends on (USB || USB_GADGET) && HAS_DMA
> >>> + select USB_PHY
> >>> select USB_XHCI_PLATFORM if USB_SUPPORT && USB_XHCI_HCD
> >>> help
> >>> Say Y or M here if your system has a Dual Role SuperSpeed
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> >>> index 474162e..cb91d70 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> >>> @@ -354,6 +354,7 @@ static int dwc3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>> struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
> >>> struct resource *res;
> >>> struct dwc3 *dwc;
> >>> + int count;
> >>>
> >>> int ret = -ENOMEM;
> >>>
> >>> @@ -387,16 +388,49 @@ static int dwc3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>> if (node) {
> >>> dwc->maximum_speed = of_usb_get_maximum_speed(node);
> >>>
> >>> - dwc->usb2_phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(dev, "usb-phy", 0);
> >>> - dwc->usb3_phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(dev, "usb-phy", 1);
> >>> + count = of_count_phandle_with_args(node, "usb-phy", NULL);
> >>> + switch (count) {
> >>> + case 2:
> >>> + dwc->usb3_phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(dev,
> >>> + "usb-phy", 1);
> >>> + if (IS_ERR(dwc->usb3_phy)) {
> >>> + dev_err(dev, "usb3 phy not found\n");
> >>> + return PTR_ERR(dwc->usb3_phy);
> >>> + }
> >>> + case 1:
> >>> + dwc->usb2_phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(dev,
> >>> + "usb-phy", 0);
> >>> + if (IS_ERR(dwc->usb2_phy)) {
> >>> + dev_err(dev, "usb2 phy not found\n");
> >>> + return PTR_ERR(dwc->usb2_phy);
> >>> + }
> >>> + break;
> >>
> >> In the Exynos case, there is only 1 phy and it is the USB3 phy. This code
> >> will wrongly treat it as usb2_phy.
> >
> > That was the case even before this patch no? Unfortunately the old USB PHY
> > library doesn't have APIs to get PHYs in a better way. If we try modifying
> > the
> > USB PHY library, it'll be kind of duplicating what is already there in the
> > Generic PHY library. I'd rather prefer Exynos guys to use the new framework.
>
> OK. I agree with you.
> Do you know if there are users of dwc3 other than exynos5250 and omap5?
> If not, we should get rid of the old USB PHY altogether.Intel's Baytrail, at least. But they don't use DT. -- balbi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
