Hi Felipe,

On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:30:34 -0600 Felipe Balbi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Actually, when I merged greg/usb-linus on top of my 'next', I got a
> conflict which was enough to solve as below:
> 
> commit d86c94d1ddeb496cf53ace1a76274ebb1d935671
> Merge: c139e14 fb5f183
> Author: Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>
> Date:   Thu Dec 19 09:20:49 2013 -0600
> 
>     Merge remote-tracking branch 'greg/usb-linus' into merge
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>
>     
>     Conflicts:
>       drivers/usb/phy/Kconfig
> 
> diff --cc drivers/usb/phy/Kconfig
> index 54bebba3,2b41c63..3ab63b5
> --- a/drivers/usb/phy/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/usb/phy/Kconfig
> @@@ -6,14 -6,6 +6,15 @@@ menu "USB Physical Layer drivers
>   config USB_PHY
>       def_bool n
>   
>  +config USB_OTG_FSM
> -     bool "USB 2.0 OTG FSM implementation"
> ++    tristate "USB 2.0 OTG FSM implementation"
>  +    select USB_OTG
>  +    select USB_PHY
> ++    depends on USB
>  +    help
>  +      Implements OTG Final State Machine as specified in On-The-Go
>  +      and Embedded Host Supplement to the USB Revision 2.0 Specification.
>  +
>   #
>   # USB Transceiver Drivers
>   #
> 
> This will make sure we have no bisection point where the build error
> would still exist. I can merge Linus' -rc5 once it's out in my 'next'
> branch and solve all problems at once.

I have added that to my merge resolution for today.

Thanks for tracking this down.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    [email protected]

Attachment: pgpsr77x4jmJL.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to