Hi Paul, On 3/3/14 9:14 PM, Paul Zimmerman wrote: >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 2:20 PM >> >> From: Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]> >> >> The dwc2 IP on the SOCFPGA cannot use the default HW configured >> FIFO sizes. The total FIFO depth as read from GHWCFG3 reports 0x1f80 or 8064 >> 32-bit words. But the GRXFSIZ, GNPTXFSIZ, and HPTXFSIZ register defaults >> to 0x2000 or 8192 32-bit words. So the driver cannot just use the fifo sizes >> as read from those registers. >> >> For platforms that face the same issue, this commits sets the RX, periodic >> TX, >> and non-periodic TX fifo size to those that are recommended v2.93a spec for >> the DWC2 IP. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]> >> Cc: Paul Zimmerman <[email protected]> >> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> >> --- >> drivers/usb/dwc2/core.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.c >> index 1d12988..e8e394c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.c >> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.c >> @@ -507,6 +507,44 @@ void dwc2_disable_host_interrupts(struct dwc2_hsotg >> *hsotg) >> writel(intmsk, hsotg->regs + GINTMSK); >> } >> >> +/* >> + * dwc2_calculate_dynamic_fifo() - Calculates the default fifo size >> + * For system that have a total fifo depth that is smaller than the default >> + * RX + TX fifo size. >> + * >> + * @hsotg: Programming view of DWC_otg controller >> + */ >> +static void dwc2_calculate_dynamic_fifo(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg) >> +{ >> + struct dwc2_core_params *params = hsotg->core_params; >> + struct dwc2_hw_params *hw = &hsotg->hw_params; >> + u32 rxfsiz, nptxfsiz, ptxfsiz, total_fifo_size; >> + >> + total_fifo_size = hw->total_fifo_size; >> + rxfsiz = params->host_rx_fifo_size; >> + nptxfsiz = params->host_nperio_tx_fifo_size; >> + ptxfsiz = params->host_perio_tx_fifo_size; >> + >> + if (total_fifo_size >= (rxfsiz + nptxfsiz + ptxfsiz)) >> + /* Params are valid, nothing to do */ >> + return; >> + else { > Kernel style says both branches of the if() statement should have > parentheses here. (Checkpatch doesn't warn about that, I thought it > did.) No, checkpatch was clean. > > Other than that it looks OK. Once you fix the parentheses, you can add > my acked-by. Thanks,
Dinh > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
