On 03/28/2014 06:50 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> We unconditionally execute scsi_eh_get_sense() to make sure all failed
> commands that should have sense attached, do.  However, the routine forgets
> that some commands, because of the way they fail, will not have any sense code
> ... we should not bother them with a REQUEST_SENSE command.  Fix this by
> testing to see if we actually got a CHECK_CONDITION return and skip asking for
> sense if we don't.
> 
> Tested-by: Alan Stern <st...@rowland.harvard.edu>
> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <jbottom...@parallels.com>
Acked-by: Hannes Reinecke <h...@suse.de>

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                   zSeries & Storage
h...@suse.de                          +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to